House
problems they were designed to overcome. It was obvious that his bold aim was
metaphorically and politically `a bridge too far' but as a platform for venting the
desires of many governments, especially the poorer and smaller ones, it was invalu-
able. And the issues it raised were to be addressed for many years to come. There-
fore, it was understandable that the next director-general of FAO, Norris E. Dodd
from the United States (194853), who had strongly supported the WFB proposal
at the Copenhagen conference in 1946, should seek to salvage what he considered
to be some of its more acceptable elements. The opportunity presented itself when
the FAO Council, which met in Paris in June 1949, requested the FAO director-
general to report on the underlying causes of emerging commodity trade problems
and present recommendations for possible action by governments. A group experts
was appointed, with John B. Conliffe of the University of California as chairman,
`to propose measures for promoting the balanced expansion of world trade in
agricultural products', in order to assist the FAO director-general make his recom-
mendations, no doubt taking the experience of what had happened to the WFB
proposal into account.
acterized by surpluses of certain commodities, particularly in the dollar area,
though supplies in other parts of the world were still only barely sufficient or
even scarce. It became apparent that food import needs existed that could not
be met from available stocks for lack of foreign exchange in food-deficit coun-
tries. The immediate problem was diagnosed as an accumulation of surpluses
in hard currency countries (principally the US dollar area) while countries with
weak inconvertible currencies found it difficult to import food on commercial
terms.
authorized capital fund equivalent to $5 billion, as an operating organization and
action arm of FAO, with the following functions:
